Before speaking about history of music, we need to find the best way to compare history with something real in our life. Maybe with a garden, because it has fundamental elements to produce fruits like earth, seeds, water, sun and a gardener to take care.
To get an overview of the actual situation, become simple to understand and explain hundreds of music’s roots, styles and currents in new music in this last 50 years. Finally, answer why contemporary music has lost its social visibility.
Always to compare with a garden, we make a bad mistake when we replace the actual production with a hypothetical or idealistic production. In other words, we need to consider the today's composers like reals protagonists of history of music. On the other hand, don’t take the archetype premeditated by intellectual elite and yours idealistic clean art based on the university’s composer because frequently they don’t right music almost Scientific’s papers. They want order what the real way forward to continue the history of music. It means that we need to harvest existing fruit.
If we compare earth with land, seeds with artists, water and sun with investments, gardener with cultural politics, we have a real panorama of what is necessary to establish a new vision of history of music.
“Make history…”? It is a delicate question, because, for some people, the true history cannot be made. Sure, we can make history, but we can’t say what kind of music will stay for a long time and, at the same time, we can’t say how long a new music will last. The only thing that we need to do is make attention to not became academic-selective, elitist and bourgeois to choice.
Nowadays, new tendencies to sponsoring is very bad because they want lucrativeness and, always in compare with a garden, they will choose seeds to grown up a fast then possible, and they will plant a great number of the same seeds to sell as much as possible.
Apparently, this seems normal and for the new generation this thinking always existed, but in reality this only happened after the liberalism imposes a fusion between culture, sport and entertainment, a bad crossover. Since then, we saw the domino effect. All these things culminate in the biggest cultural commerce. The consequences are a gradual extinction of independent artists and repetitions and remakes to fill the empty space due to low quality of this new cultural postulate.
Wait! We can’t consider art and culture like clothes or cars, one touch sensibility, tenderness, feeling and cultural identity, another means appearance and comfort; it exists to show our social position and wellness, not more.
Concerning styles and music’s trend, they are submitted to technological means to be in good standing with consumers. In this case, the music become a service of utilities like water or electricity. We arent no more proprietary but a consumer. Now we rent out of the 60,000 new songs offered daily on the Internet
All this purposes justifies a new approach to describe the process in “field” composition and their ramifications.
Keep it simple